HOMEPROFILEPRESS OFFICELATEST NEWSENQUIRYCONTACT

....... Environmental Liability

Section 24(a) of Act 108 of 1996 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa guarantees the right of every person to an environment that is "not harmful to their health or wellbeing. Effect is given to this right in the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA) through the imposition of a duty that requires that:

"Every person who causes, has caused or may cause significant pollution or degradation of the environment or degradation from occurring, continuing or recurring, or, in so far as such harm to the environment is authorised by law or can not be reasonably avoided or stopped, to minimise and rectify such pollution or degradation of the environment." (Section 28[1])

A very similar duty of care, but specific to water resources, is set out in Section 19 of the National Water Act 36 if 1998 (NWA) where once again "reasonable measures" must be taken to prevent or rehabilitate pollution.


Both NEMA and the NWA include historical contamination as one of the triggers for the obligation. As such, it was the intention of the drafters of the legislation to require reasonable measures to be taken not only where activities are currently causing pollution or where they may in future cause pollution, but also where past activities have caused contamination, which contamination remains evident in our environment today.

While conceding that it is somewhat harsh to compel a company to incur substantial costs today for activities that were not considered particularly irregular 120 years ago, the alternative solution is far more unpalatable - namely that ordinary taxpayers, who have no connection whatsoever to the harm, and derived no benefit from it, will through the clean-up activities of Government, be compelled to pay for the remediation of the affected environments. In balancing unfairness towards parties connected to the polluter and who derived financial benefit from the pollution against the even greater unfairness that would result for ordinary taxpayers having to fund the clean-ups, the retrospective provision in Section 28 of the NEMA was intended to apply to activities that took place and to harm that arose at any time historically whether before or after the inception of NEMA in 1999. (Ian Sampson - Environmental and Sustainability Law, Shepstone & Wylie Attorneys.)






Environmental Justice Enforcement

Corporate Accountability

Environmental Liability



....

Learn more about Environmental whistle blower, Mariette Liefferink...
....


 
     
Copyright Public Environmental Arbiters ................................................................. dESIGNED bY ORANGE SOLUTIONS

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ENFORCEMENT | CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY | ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY

HOME | PROFILE | PRESS OFFICE | LATEST NEWS | ENQUIRY | CONTACT